Brand advocacy

brand Brand advocacy

Brand advocacy

I read a fine article in Marketing magazine about brand advocacy.

“Marketing often gains a reputation for cherishing style over substance. Its detractors accuse it of shouting about product benefits, or, in the absence of these, a nebulous lifestyle positioning, regardless of the quality of the customer experience.

“But in reality, plenty of brands over the years have found the opposite strategy to be more effective: don’t shout too loudly, then delight consumers when the product experience exceeds their expectations.

“The strategy of under-promising and over-delivering is one that seems to be gaining ground. Two recent studies suggest it is key to delivering profitable growth, though both underline how many brands continue to disappoint.”

Read the rest of this at Brand Republic.

Modifying corporate logos

woolworths logo Modifying corporate logos

Woolworths fascia

Should people play around with corporate logos?

I think Google has added to their brand image by creating seasonal treatments for its logo. St Patrick’s Day and Christmas themes spring to mind. The modifications have given their business more of a sense of personality.

Here, in the photo, is the temporarily tweaked Woolworths fascia board from Broad Street, Reading. I’m in two minds as to whether this approach really works. I may be feeling negative as the snow covered doughnut bits are stuck over the letters in a temporary fashion.

This subject reminds me of the time when an enthusiastic marketing manager for Penguin Books in Australia changed their world famous logo – they put the Penguin on a surfboard and gave him some sunglasses! Normal use of the logo was resumed quite quickly.

What’s your view on this subject?

Buying better for a greater ROI

Get the buying process right and your promotions and incentives will win over consumers.

Promotions and incentives are big business. Motivating consumers with on-pack promotions, merchandise, vouchers or money off coupons, continue to play an important role in the marketing mix. In fact, the size of the motivation market in the UK is worth about £6.3bn. Yet, successful promotions aren’t always guaranteed. It’s easy for marketers to buy into a ‘one size fits all’ promotion – but 2008 should be about getting the buying process right.

The two essential components to a successful promotional campaign are relevance and communication. Marketers need to make the right choice of promotional tool for the recipient – promotions can open the door to a world of experiences all of which can be rewarding and inspiring, but they won’t be effective unless they are relevant to the recipient. The promotion needs to be useful and the quality on offer has to be tangible. Quality cannot just be ‘perceived’, it must be experienced, for instance, through regular, excellent customer service and enjoyed through extra added value.

Secondly, there is communication. A product or service, however excellent, is of no use unless people know about it, understand it, and appreciate how and why it is better than a competitor’s offering. Retailers, promotional issuers, and marketers themselves have a role to play in communicating the advantages. A well planned communication channel with consumers is essential, but marketers should not forget that communication is two-way. Customer feedback presents opportunities to make promotions even better.

I would take it one step further and argue that when choosing a promotion, marketers should look at their buying process and reassess at every stage. If we take gift vouchers as an example – gift vouchers and cards play an important role in promotions and incentives. With a changing array of services and products on offer, the shopping voucher and card are of prime importance in the marketing mix, bringing flexibility, convenience and a perceived higher value that cash. However, marketers would be better to ignore the urge to compare what discounts they can get from different suppliers and instead concentrate on what is the best choice in terms of relevance to the consumer.

Communication is something that I believe in very strongly. In fact, we are currently actively telling our customers to spend less with us and invest more in their communication methods. It’s worth noting that the more invested in communication, the better the return on investment.
Let us not also forget added value. In this day and age, consumers are looking for, and indeed in come cases expect, more than just face value. It’s worth marketers investigating the added value that a supplier can offer. This added value could be something they could pass on to the recipient, which could take the form of discounts, promotions or giveaways. We set up the SayShopping Privilege Club this year to give useful added value to our customers, which includes monthly prize draws and downloadable money off coupons for extra discounts with our retail partners.

Technology will continue to impact on our industry. The spectacular rise of e-commerce through the internet has changed everything. The UK is now Europe’s largest online shopping market. This has been possible, in part through cheaper computers, more widespread broadband connections, and the proliferation of retail websites. Indeed, UK retailers are widely viewed as being the most modern, most innovative and most active in Europe. The internet gives marketers an exciting and adaptable platform to access consumers. Promotions and incentives will have to adapt and reflect consumer needs, and suppliers should be one step ahead of demand. In 2008 marketers should look out for increased presence of gift cards (plastic credit-card designed vouchers), online e-vouchers and coupons and SMS promotional added value.

So what then does the future hold? Where will promotions and incentives be this time next year? Well, if marketers take heed and find ways to improve their buying power, they will benefit from more efficient, more consistent, and more cost-effective promotional programmes. Old-style, random or one-off promotions will decline. Promotions and incentives will become the home for motivation. Ultimately, marketers will themselves benefit not only from inspired consumers but also from the tangible return on investment they’ve made into ‘buying better’.

Great service and net promoter score

word of mouth Great service and net promoter score

Word of mouth

Good service leaves a positive and lasting impression. Unfortunately we all too often end up telling friends and colleagues of the poor service we have received.

My shopping experiences this Christmas have been really quite good: service levels have been good; stock availability better than expected; till queues well managed.

My star retail sales person in the last week is Geoff Noronha at Dawsons http://www.dawsons.co.uk/ in Reading. He delivered useful advice and his efficiency and combined good humour made the experience a pleasure.

Great service leaves a more marked impression than advertising, but of course you have to get the customer in the shop first!

Thinking of this reminds of Net Promoter Score http://www.netpromoter.com/ (NPS). It really is a simple but effective business metric:-

Companies obtain their Net Promoter Score by asking customers a single question (usually, “How likely is it that you would recommend us to a friend or colleague?”). Based on their responses, customers can be categorised into one of three groups: Promoters, Passives, and Detractors.

In the net promoter framework, Promoters are viewed as valuable assets that drive profitable growth because of their repeat/increased purchases, longevity and referrals, while Detractors are seen as liabilities that destroy profitable growth because of their complaints, reduced purchases/defection and negative word-of-mouth.

Companies calculate their Net Promoter Score by subtracting their % Detractors from their % Promoters.

Proponents of the Net Promoter approach claim the score can be used to motivate an organisation to become more focused on improving products and services for customers. They further claim that a company’s relative Net Promoter Score (its score relative to competitors) correlates with revenue growth relative to competitors.

Incoming search terms:

  • mcdonald\s net promoter score
  • relative net promoter score